New Issue Brief Documents Sweeping State Action to Address Aggressive Federal Law Enforcement Tactics
State Futures details how state legislators are restricting anonymous policing, protecting sensitive locations, and safeguarding personal data in response to escalating federal enforcement activity
Washington, DC — June 1 – Across the country, federal immigration enforcement operations have expanded into schools, courthouses, and places of worship. Reports of unidentified agents making arrests, aggressive tactics, and a lack of transparency around detention and deportation have alarmed communities, local officials, and state leaders. In response, state legislators are using every tool available — legislation, oversight, and strategic communications — to protect residents and assert state authority over law enforcement within their borders.
Today, State Futures released a new Issue Brief documenting the breadth and depth of this state-level response, cataloging legislative strategies that states are deploying to limit harmful enforcement practices, strengthen accountability, and protect civil rights.
"Federal enforcement tactics have put states in a position they shouldn't have to be in — but state lawmakers are stepping up with real legislative solutions," said Gaby Goldstein, President of State Futures. "What this brief shows is that these aren't isolated responses. Legislators across the country are building a coherent body of law to protect their communities, and they're learning from each other to do it."
Key areas of state action documented in the brief include:
Restricting anonymous policing. Six states have enacted laws requiring law enforcement to be clearly identifiable and restricting the use of masks or face coverings, with more than 20 additional states considering similar legislation.
Limiting immigration enforcement in sensitive locations. Ten states have passed laws directly limiting immigration enforcement activity in schools, courthouses, places of worship, and health care settings.
Protecting personal data. States are restricting the collection and sharing of immigration-related data by law enforcement, schools, health care providers, and private companies. Oregon, for example, enacted a law preventing private companies from selling personal data for immigration enforcement without a warrant.
Setting standards for law enforcement conduct. States are advancing legislation to restrict dangerous tactics, including bills to prevent enforcement from interfering with emergency response and to require intervention against excessive force.
Leveraging oversight tools. Legislators are using hearings, task forces, and community forums to document the impact of federal enforcement and build the public record for further action.
Coordinating across states. Legislators are amplifying their efforts through press engagement and cross-state initiatives, including the State Futures Federal Response Coalition.
This is the second issue brief in State Futures' ongoing series on state responses to federal immigration enforcement. In April, State Futures released a brief on state action to hold detention facilities accountable. All State Futures issue briefs are available at statefutures.org/research.
Journalists covering law enforcement, immigration policy, civil liberties, data privacy, or federal-state dynamics are encouraged to read the brief and reach out for interviews. State Futures can connect press with state policymakers actively pursuing these strategies.
Read the full issue brief: https://www.statefutures.org/research/issue-brief-law-enforcement
About State Futures: State Futures is a national, nonpartisan nonprofit that supports a network of 850+ values-aligned state policymakers, including legislators and State Financial Officers. We support bold, values-aligned state leaders by convening them, equipping them with tools and resources, and empowering collective action to achieve impact beyond any single state.
Media Contact: Kristen Wilder, info@statefutures.org
###
